Screener
EUFN vs IXG
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF vs iShares Global Financials ETF
Key differences
- IXG costs 0.08% less per year.
- EUFN is significantly larger than IXG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EUFN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EUFN | IXG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.6B | $541M |
| Since | 2010 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 3.50% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.6% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.2% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.37 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.58% | 13.67% |
| Max drawdown | -53.26% | -43.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EUFN and IXG
Explore further