Screener
EVYM vs XAGG
Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF vs Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- EVYM costs 0.10% less per year.
- XAGG is significantly larger than EVYM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EVYM follows a index tracking strategy; XAGG uses active selection.
- XAGG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EVYM | XAGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $963M |
| Since | 2025 | 1997 |
| Dividend yield | 4.81% | 6.36% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.76% | — |
| Max drawdown | -6.08% | -2.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EVYM and XAGG
Explore further