Screener
EWW vs DBJP
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
Key differences
Both EWW and DBJP are equity ETFs. EWW charges 0.50% a year and DBJP 0.45%. The main difference: EWW covers Latin America; DBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWW covers Latin America; DBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWW is much larger than DBJP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, DBJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWW | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $660M |
| Since | 1996 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.07% | 2.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | latin america | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +48.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | +20.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.43 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.39% | 19.03% |
| Max drawdown | -53.62% | -31.30% |
Similar to EWW and DBJP
Explore further