Screener
EXI vs RIFR
iShares Global Industrials ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- EXI costs 0.20% less per year.
- EXI is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EXI follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- EXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EXI | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $42M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.18% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.89% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -39.56% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EXI and RIFR
Explore further