Screener
EYEG vs CRUX
AB Corporate Bond ETF vs Columbia Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CRUX is significantly larger than EYEG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EYEG is classified as alternative, while CRUX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EYEG follows a multi strategy strategy; CRUX uses active selection.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EYEG | CRUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.98% | 4.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.44% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.66% | -1.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EYEG and CRUX
Explore further