Screener
EZBC vs BTRN
Franklin Templeton Digital Holdings Trust vs Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
Key differences
- EZBC costs 0.76% less per year.
- EZBC is significantly larger than BTRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZBC | BTRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $477M | $2M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 27.44% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | -31.2% | -15.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.20% | 19.85% |
| Max drawdown | -49.37% | -36.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZBC and BTRN
Explore further