Screener
EZPZ vs CHNU
Franklin Crypto Index ETF vs 2x Chainlink ETF
Key differences
- EZPZ costs 1.66% less per year.
- EZPZ is significantly larger than CHNU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZPZ follows a index tracking strategy; CHNU uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZPZ | CHNU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 1.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $1M |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -32.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 46.43% | — |
| Max drawdown | -52.38% | -24.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZPZ and CHNU
Explore further