Screener
EZRO vs AAVM
Alphadroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF vs Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
Key differences
- AAVM costs 0.63% less per year.
- EZRO follows a index tracking strategy; AAVM uses active selection.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZRO | AAVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $24M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -11.57% | -34.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZRO and AAVM
Explore further