Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EZU vs FLEU

iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF vs Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF

EZU

iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$9.4B

FLEU

Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF

Annual cost

0.09%

Fund size

$71M

Key differences

EZU is an equity ETF, while FLEU is an alternative ETF. EZU charges 0.50% a year and FLEU 0.09%.

  • EZU is an equity fund, while FLEU is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • EZU follows a index tracking strategy; FLEU uses option income.
  • FLEU costs 0.41% less per year.
  • EZU is much larger than FLEU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, EZU has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EZU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EZUFLEU
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.09%
Fund size (AUM)$9.4B$71M
Since20002017
Dividend yield2.66%2.07%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionglobal
Strategyindex trackingoption income
CAGR 1Y+17.2%+16.3%
CAGR 3Y+18.6%+16.9%
CAGR 5Y+8.8%+11.7%
Sharpe 3Y0.870.79
Volatility 1Y17.10%17.18%
Max drawdown-41.37%-33.94%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to EZU and FLEU