Skip to content
Screener

FAAR vs MOOD

First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

FAAR

First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.98%

Fund size

$176M

MOOD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.73%

Fund size

$143M

Key differences

Both FAAR and MOOD are alternative ETFs. FAAR charges 0.98% a year and MOOD 0.73%. The main difference: FAAR follows a long short strategy; MOOD uses tactical allocation.

  • FAAR follows a long short strategy; MOOD uses tactical allocation.
  • MOOD costs 0.25% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, MOOD has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

FAARMOOD
Annual cost (TER)0.98%0.73%
Fund size (AUM)$176M$143M
Since20162022
Dividend yield9.19%0.35%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth america
Strategylong shorttactical allocation
CAGR 1Y+33.2%+34.3%
CAGR 3Y+11.1%+20.6%
CAGR 5Y+7.4%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.671.43
Volatility 1Y13.49%14.49%
Max drawdown-18.03%-14.34%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to FAAR and MOOD