Screener
FAAR vs RLY
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
Key differences
FAAR is an alternative ETF, while RLY is a fixed income ETF. FAAR charges 0.98% a year and RLY 0.50%.
- FAAR is an alternative fund, while RLY is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FAAR follows a long short strategy; RLY uses active selection.
- RLY costs 0.48% less per year.
- RLY is much larger than FAAR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RLY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAAR | RLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $176M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2016 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 9.19% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.2% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | +14.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.49% | 10.38% |
| Max drawdown | -18.03% | -34.17% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.