Screener
FAAR vs XNAV
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
Both FAAR and XNAV are alternative ETFs. FAAR charges 0.98% a year and XNAV 1.27%. The main difference: FAAR follows a long short strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- FAAR follows a long short strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- FAAR costs 0.29% less per year.
- FAAR is much larger than XNAV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAAR | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $176M | $34M |
| Since | 2016 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 9.19% | 0.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.2% | +39.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.49% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -18.03% | -24.27% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.