Screener
FAB vs AFSM
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund vs First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- FAB costs 0.09% less per year.
- FAB follows a index tracking strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAB | AFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $94M |
| Since | 2007 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 17.84% |
| Max drawdown | -47.08% | -43.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAB and AFSM
Explore further