Screener
FAB vs VFVA
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund vs Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF Shares
Key differences
- VFVA costs 0.53% less per year.
- VFVA is significantly larger than FAB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAB follows a index tracking strategy; VFVA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VFVA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAB | VFVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $815M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 1.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +30.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | +9.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 15.53% |
| Max drawdown | -47.08% | -48.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAB and VFVA
Explore further