Screener
FAD vs EPMV
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund vs Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- FAD costs 0.25% less per year.
- FAD is significantly larger than EPMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAD | EPMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $480M | $4M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.2% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.41% | 15.28% |
| Max drawdown | -37.25% | -8.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAD and EPMV
Explore further