Screener
FAD vs IMCG
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IMCG costs 0.57% less per year.
- IMCG is significantly larger than FAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FAD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAD | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $480M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.2% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.41% | 15.45% |
| Max drawdown | -37.25% | -35.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAD and IMCG
Explore further