Screener
FALN vs AGG
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF vs iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- AGG costs 0.22% less per year.
- AGG is significantly larger than FALN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FALN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FALN | AGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $135.4B |
| Since | 2016 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 6.42% | 3.95% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.6% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.6% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.0% | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.58% | 3.90% |
| Max drawdown | -29.22% | -18.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FALN and AGG
Explore further