Screener
FAS vs METU
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
Key differences
- FAS costs 0.14% less per year.
- FAS is significantly larger than METU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAS | METU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 1.02% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $367M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 10.14% | 3.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.5% | -26.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.90% | 69.39% |
| Max drawdown | -85.99% | -61.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAS and METU
Explore further