Screener
FAZ vs HIBL
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- HIBL costs 0.05% less per year.
- FAZ follows a inverse strategy; HIBL uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, HIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAZ | HIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $83M |
| Since | 2008 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.00% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.8% | +242.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -38.5% | +60.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -27.5% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.84 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.24% | 66.14% |
| Max drawdown | -99.78% | -88.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAZ and HIBL
Explore further