Screener
FAZ vs RETL
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- RETL costs 0.07% less per year.
- FAZ is significantly larger than RETL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAZ follows a inverse strategy; RETL uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, RETL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAZ | RETL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $32M |
| Since | 2008 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 3.00% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.8% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -38.5% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -27.5% | -29.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.84 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.24% | 60.15% |
| Max drawdown | -99.78% | -92.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAZ and RETL
Explore further