Screener
FAZ vs WEBL
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- WEBL costs 0.07% less per year.
- FAZ follows a inverse strategy; WEBL uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, WEBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAZ | WEBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $113M |
| Since | 2008 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.00% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.8% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -38.5% | +44.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -27.5% | -15.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.84 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.24% | 55.95% |
| Max drawdown | -99.78% | -94.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAZ and WEBL
Explore further