Screener
FBCG vs MFSV
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Key differences
- MFSV costs 0.13% less per year.
- FBCG is significantly larger than MFSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCG | MFSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.2B | $443M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.2% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.65% | 10.31% |
| Max drawdown | -43.56% | -12.74% |
Similar to FBCG and MFSV
Explore further