Screener
FBL vs AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
Key differences
- AMDL is significantly larger than FBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBL | AMDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.09% | 1.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $185M | $944M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.63% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -25.4% | +956.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +39.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 69.42% | 128.56% |
| Max drawdown | -61.15% | -88.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBL and AMDL
Explore further