Screener
FBND vs STOT
Fidelity Total Bond ETF vs State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
Key differences
- FBND costs 0.09% less per year.
- FBND is significantly larger than STOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBND covers global markets; STOT covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBND | STOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25.6B | $428M |
| Since | 2014 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.70% | 4.40% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.1% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.5% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.9% | +2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.90% | 1.38% |
| Max drawdown | -17.25% | -6.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBND and STOT
Explore further