Screener
FBND vs TUGN
Fidelity Total Bond ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- FBND costs 0.29% less per year.
- FBND is significantly larger than TUGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBND is classified as fixed income, while TUGN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FBND covers global markets; TUGN covers north america.
- FBND follows a index tracking strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBND | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25.6B | $78M |
| Since | 2014 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.70% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.1% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.5% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.90% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -17.25% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBND and TUGN
Explore further