Screener
FCBD vs TLH
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF vs iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- TLH costs 0.69% less per year.
- TLH is significantly larger than FCBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FCBD follows a active selection strategy; TLH uses index tracking.
- TLH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCBD | TLH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $41M | $12.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.22% | 4.39% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +0.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -3.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.35% | 8.14% |
| Max drawdown | -1.64% | -41.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCBD and TLH
Explore further