Screener
FCOR vs ZTEN
Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF vs F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- ZTEN costs 0.21% less per year.
- FCOR is significantly larger than ZTEN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FCOR covers north america markets; ZTEN covers global.
- FCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCOR | ZTEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $339M | $30M |
| Since | 2014 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.55% | 5.56% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.8% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.44% | 5.06% |
| Max drawdown | -22.60% | -5.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCOR and ZTEN
Explore further