Screener
FCUS vs RFFC
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.32% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, FCUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCUS | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $29M |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +90.5% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.8% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 33.71% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -39.89% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCUS and RFFC
Explore further