Screener
FDAT vs ACIO
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF
Key differences
FDAT is a fixed income ETF, while ACIO is an alternative ETF. FDAT charges 0.78% a year and ACIO 0.79%.
- FDAT is a fixed income fund, while ACIO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; ACIO uses option income.
- ACIO is much larger than FDAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ACIO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | ACIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2023 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 5.63% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.8% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.36% | 8.63% |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -14.19% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.