Screener
FDAT vs ONOF
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF
Key differences
Both FDAT and ONOF are fixed income ETFs. FDAT charges 0.78% a year and ONOF 0.39%. The main difference: FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; ONOF uses active selection.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; ONOF uses active selection.
- ONOF costs 0.39% less per year.
- ONOF is much larger than FDAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ONOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $144M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.63% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.8% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +13.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.36% | 11.67% |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -26.21% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.