Screener
FDG vs CATF
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- CATF costs 0.18% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than CATF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDG is classified as equity, while CATF is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | CATF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $75M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.55% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 3.14% |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -4.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and CATF
Explore further