Screener
FDG vs KONG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.44% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDG is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FDG follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $22M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.3% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.0% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.85% | 10.90% |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -19.98% |
Similar to FDG and KONG
Explore further