Screener
FDG vs QGRO
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- QGRO costs 0.16% less per year.
- QGRO is significantly larger than FDG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDG follows a active selection strategy; QGRO uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2020 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.2% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.6% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 15.36% |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -32.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and QGRO
Explore further