Screener
FDIQ vs PXJ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF vs Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF
Key differences
- FDIQ costs 0.28% less per year.
- FDIQ is classified as fixed income, while PXJ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, PXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDIQ | PXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $137M |
| Since | 2011 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.42% | 2.06% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +95.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +20.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.13% | 26.41% |
| Max drawdown | -52.86% | -87.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDIQ and PXJ
Explore further