Screener
FDLO vs LOWV
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF vs AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
Key differences
- FDLO costs 0.24% less per year.
- FDLO is significantly larger than LOWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDLO follows a index tracking strategy; LOWV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, LOWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FDLO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDLO | LOWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $199M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.4% | +13.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.91% | 10.56% |
| Max drawdown | -34.35% | -13.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDLO and LOWV
Explore further