Screener
FDMO vs AAVM
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF vs Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
Key differences
- FDMO costs 0.23% less per year.
- FDMO is significantly larger than AAVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDMO follows a index tracking strategy; AAVM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FDMO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDMO | AAVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $842M | $24M |
| Since | 2016 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 1.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.3% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.48% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -33.94% | -34.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDMO and AAVM
Explore further