Screener
FDRS vs BAFE
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.05% less per year.
- BAFE is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while BAFE is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; BAFE uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | BAFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.29% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.12% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -18.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and BAFE
Explore further