Screener
FDRS vs DFAU
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
Key differences
- DFAU costs 0.37% less per year.
- DFAU is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while DFAU is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; DFAU uses active selection.
- DFAU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | DFAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $11.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.94% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.21% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -23.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and DFAU
Explore further