Screener
FDRS vs FFF
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Founders 100 ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.26% less per year.
- FDRS is significantly larger than FFF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while FFF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; FFF uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | FFF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $3M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -21.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and FFF
Explore further