Screener
FDRS vs FMET
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Fidelity Metaverse ETF
Key differences
- FMET costs 0.10% less per year.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while FMET is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; FMET uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | FMET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $45M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.55% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.55% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -29.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and FMET
Explore further