Screener
FDRS vs GINN
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
Key differences
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while GINN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; GINN uses index tracking.
- GINN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | GINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $206M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.09% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -41.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and GINN
Explore further