Screener
FDRS vs HACK
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.11% less per year.
- HACK is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while HACK is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; HACK uses index tracking.
- HACK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 24.04% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -38.68% |
Similar to FDRS and HACK
Explore further