Screener
FDRS vs NLR
Corgi ETF Trust I vs VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
Key differences
- NLR is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while NLR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; NLR uses index tracking.
- NLR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $5.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +40.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +36.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +22.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 41.97% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -34.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and NLR
Explore further