Screener
FDRS vs OEF
Corgi ETF Trust I vs iShares S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- OEF costs 0.29% less per year.
- OEF is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while OEF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; OEF uses index tracking.
- OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | OEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $19.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.86% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -31.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and OEF
Explore further