Screener
FDRS vs PCRB
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
Key differences
- PCRB costs 0.13% less per year.
- FDRS is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while PCRB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; PCRB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | PCRB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $7M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 9.54% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.80% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -7.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and PCRB
Explore further