Screener
FDRS vs PFUT
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.15% less per year.
- FDRS is significantly larger than PFUT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while PFUT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; PFUT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $5M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -44.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and PFUT
Explore further