Screener
FDRS vs RONB
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Baron First Principles ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.51% less per year.
- RONB is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while RONB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; RONB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | RONB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $388M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -13.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and RONB
Explore further