Screener
FDRS vs SCHC
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHC costs 0.41% less per year.
- SCHC is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while SCHC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS covers north america markets; SCHC covers global ex us.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; SCHC uses index tracking.
- SCHC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | SCHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $5.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.34% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.52% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -43.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and SCHC
Explore further