Screener
FDRS vs SCHV
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.45% less per year.
- SCHV is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while SCHV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; SCHV uses index tracking.
- SCHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $15.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.85% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.71% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -37.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and SCHV
Explore further