Screener
FDRS vs SECT
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.20% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while SECT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; SECT uses active selection.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | SECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.65% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.14% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -38.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and SECT
Explore further